Home The Writings of James Cahill Responses & Reminiscences 9.Angry Response To Talk In Shanghai
9.Angry Response To Talk In Shanghai PDF Print E-mail

9. Angry Response to Talk in Shanghai.
Hong Zaixin had heard about this from somebody, and asked me about it. I wrote him:

About my talk in Shanghai: I was a Visiting Scholar at Fudan U. in 1986, and gave the lecture for the Zhongguo Yishujia Xiehui at that time, probably the Fall of ’86, with a Ms. Zhou from Fudan as my interpreter. The lecture was titled “Xieyi as a Cause of Decline in Later Chinese Painting”; a somewhat shortened form of it is the “Afterword” in Three Alternative Histories (pp. 100-112.) I have never experienced such a hostile reaction—the audience was made up largely of artists, and it made some of them furious. I pointed out that it was in some part based on writings by Chinese writers, as quoted in the lecture, but that didn’t placate them. Of course, I can understand why; it undermines some of their most cherished beliefs.) I should mention that a senior artist, whose name I don’t remember, was sitting at the back and objecting noisily; at one point he shouted that one of the paintings on the screen (a Wu Changshuo) was a fake. I responded that he could be right, but I was only using it as an example, and its authenticity didn’t affect my point.

 

Latest Work

Latest Blog Posts

  • WHAT WENT WRONG?
      WHAT WENT WRONG? Before I get to the main matter of today’s blog, let me note with sorrow the death of Maurice Sendak, whose books have been among the favorites of my two pairs of children and myself--we...
    Read More...